than €500 million per year. Their turnover
        
        
          received a major boost in the past three years,
        
        
          mainly from the provision of combined services
        
        
          (e.g. telephony and Internet) through the
        
        
          unbundling of the local loop. And, undercutting
        
        
          OTE’s rates, they managed to control 50% of
        
        
          broadband connections.
        
        
          The main advantage of OTE’s competitors lies in
        
        
          the comparatively lower prices they offer. Being
        
        
          the incumbent, OTE has its prices regulated by
        
        
          the EETT, and is rarely in a position to match its
        
        
          competitors’ rates. In the past few years, this led
        
        
          to incessant squabbles between OTE and the
        
        
          EETT, with the former accusing the latter of put-
        
        
          ting obstacles in its commercial policy, and the
        
        
          regulator responding that it merely enforces EU
        
        
          and national law. In some cases, both sides used
        
        
          bitter words to describe each other’s role in the
        
        
          telecoms market.
        
        
          However, although the rivals of OTE have taken
        
        
          many steps forward, the landscape in this sector
        
        
          remains vague. In an effort to capture market
        
        
          shares, the larger alternative providers (Forthnet,
        
        
          Hellas Online) continue to make loss-making
        
        
          offers. Moreover, they are heavily indebted. The
        
        
          alternative providers’ annual losses for the period
        
        
          2008-09 exceeded €150 million, and are expect-
        
        
          ed to rise in 2010. Nonetheless, these losses
        
        
          were primarily caused by the increased amortiza-
        
        
          tion that resulted from the heavy investments
        
        
          these companies made during the period 2007-
        
        
          2009, in order to go up a rung on the investment
        
        
          ladder of the Greek telecommunications market.
        
        
          
            The year 2010
          
        
        
          Although the final data for 2010 have not been
        
        
          published yet, everything points to the fact that
        
        
          last year was the sector’s worst. As a result of the
        
        
          debt crisis that hit the country in 2009, combined
        
        
          with the harsh austerity program that the govern-
        
        
          ment
        
        
          implemented
        
        
          after signing
        
        
          the
        
        
          Memorandum with the IMF, the ECB and the EU,
        
        
          the sector’s fundamentals are dipping to new
        
        
          lows. The drop in the sector’s turnover is larger
        
        
          than that of the GDP, which in 2010 has already
        
        
          been estimated by the Eurostat at 4.5%.
        
        
          The results announced by OTE for 2010 under-
        
        
          lined the sector’s problems. Fixed and mobile
        
        
          telephony revenues dropped by 10% in Greece,
        
        
          while the decrease in profits was even steeper.
        
        
          The Group’s earnings before interest, taxes,
        
        
          depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) fell by
        
        
          40%, while net earnings fell by 90%. However,
        
        
          the nose-dive of OTE’s profitability is also attrib-
        
        
          uted to a series of external factors, such as the
        
        
          one-off tax contribution imposed by the govern-
        
        
          ment on corporate profits for 2009, the impair-
        
        
          ment of the group’s subsidiaries’ assets etc. That
        
        
          said, the substantial decrease in profits under-
        
        
          lines the difficulties faced by the operator.
        
        
          However, OTE’s competitors are also facing
        
        
          severe problems. Wind Hellas, which in 12
        
        
          months carried out two debt restructurings, writ-
        
        
          ing off loans of €3 billion, is expected to report a
        
        
          €1 billion loss for 2010. This huge loss is to a
        
        
          great extent due to the impairment of the compa-
        
        
          ny’s assets, and only partly due to operating loss-
        
        
          es. At the same time, the company’s revenues
        
        
          took a plunge, which in 2010 (based on the 9-
        
        
          month results) is expected to reach 30%.
        
        
          Wind’s main rival, Vodafone, also saw its rev-
        
        
          enues and earnings plummet during 2010. The
        
        
          company’s revenues for the first half of the fiscal
        
        
          year ended last September (the company’s fiscal
        
        
          year begins on April 4) is down by 16% and its
        
        
          EBITDA are down by a dazzling 60%. In 2010, the
        
        
          
            Trade with Greece
          
        
        
          
            124